Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 123: 58-69, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2015423

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time in days between symptom onset and first positive real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) result for COVID-19. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus databases using the following descriptors: "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "coronavirus", "RT-PCR", "real time PCR", and "diagnosis". RESULTS: The included studies were conducted in 31 different countries and reported on a total of 6831 patients. The median age of the participants was 49.95 years. The three most common symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea, which affected 4012 (58.68%), 3192 (46.69%), and 2009 patients (29.38%), respectively. Among the 90 included studies, 13 were prospective cohorts, 15 were retrospective cohorts, 36 were case reports, 20 were case series, and six were cross-sectional studies. The overall mean time between symptom onset and positive test result was 6.72 days. Fourteen articles were analyzed separately for the temporal profile of RT-PCR test results; the best performance was on days 22-24, when 98% of test results were positive. CONCLUSION: These findings corroborate the RT-PCR COVID-19 testing practices of some health units. In addition, the most frequently described symptoms of these patients can be considered the initial symptoms of infection and used in decision-making about RT-PCR testing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.
NPJ Regen Med ; 6(1): 73, 2021 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1507100

ABSTRACT

Despite global efforts to establish effective interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its major complications, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the treatment remains mainly supportive. Hence, identifying an effective and safe therapy for severe COVID-19 is critical for saving lives. A significant number of cell-based therapies have been through clinical investigation. In this study, we performed a systematic review of clinical studies investigating different types of stem cells as treatments for COVID-19 and ARDS to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of cell therapy. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Among the 29 studies, there were eight case reports, five Phase I clinical trials, four pilot studies, two Phase II clinical trials, one cohort, and one case series. Among the clinical studies, 21 studies used cell therapy to treat COVID-19, while eight studies investigated cell therapy as a treatment for ARDS. Most of these (75%) used mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to treat COVID-19 and ARDS. Findings from the analyzed articles indicate a positive impact of stem cell therapy on crucial immunological and inflammatory processes that lead to lung injury in COVID-19 and ARDS patients. Additionally, among the studies, there were no reported deaths causally linked to cell therapy. In addition to standard care treatments concerning COVID-19 management, there has been supportive evidence towards adjuvant therapies to reduce mortality rates and improve recovery of care treatment. Therefore, MSCs treatment could be considered a potential candidate for adjuvant therapy in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 cases and compassionate use.

3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 624166, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1120236

ABSTRACT

Background: Pregnant women are susceptible to the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and the consequences for the fetus are still uncertain. Here, we present a case of a pregnant woman with subclinical hypothyroidism and a plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G polymorphism who was infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the end of the third trimester of pregnancy, with unexpected evolution of death of the newborn 4 days postpartum. Methods: Nested PCR was performed to detect the virus, followed by ssDNA sequencing. Results: Transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 can cause placental inflammation, ischemia, and neonatal viremia, with complications such as preterm labor and damage to the placental barrier in patients with PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism. Conclusion: We showed a newborn with several damages potentially caused due to the PAI-1 polymorphisms carried by the mother infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL